Getting kind of pathetic isn't it? The lies are broad and bold these days.
Peace, K On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:51 PM, muckblit wrote: > This after Washington Times printed a front page story pretty fair to > David Ray Griffin. All they could spin up in the mud blender > against him > was that he used the United Presbyterian Church's press after hours to > print leaflets decrying cremation without representation, the > cremation > of Rodney Dickens and Asia Cottoms and about three thousand other > piffling tea bags. > > -Bob D > > --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Vigilius Haufniensis" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27267989.shtml >> >> C-SPAN Promotes 9/11 'Truth' Movement >> By Cliff Kincaid >> Aug 28, 2006 >> >> "Thank God for C-SPAN" is what we used to say about the channel's > habit of airing material that the rest of the media usually won't > touch. > But C-SPAN's airing of a "9/11 Truth" panel has only served to poison > the public debate about the nature of the Islamic fascist threat. The > panel featured Webster Tarpley, a former member of the Lyndon LaRouche > organization, which specializes in blaming the Zionists, Britain > and the > Queen of England for the world's problems. LaRouche is a former > Marxist > and Democratic presidential candidate who served prison time on > financial fraud charges. He defended Iraq before the first Persian > Gulf > War. >> >> If this kind of event is considered "news," then we can expect C-SPAN > to air panel discussions about extraterrestrials, flying saucers, and > alien abductions. >> >> The two-day event, "American Scholars Symposium: 9/11 and The Neo-Con > Agenda," was held in Los Angeles and began with host Alex Jones > thanking > C-SPAN for covering the affair, as participants rose to their feet > in a > standing ovation for the channel. Several panelists focused on > questions > or anomalies in how the Twin Towers collapsed. One became almost > bug-eyed as he offered 10 reasons to believe that the 9/11 hijackers > were "fake." >> >> Even before the airing of this event, there was evidence that a > significant number of people were falling victim to the propaganda > that > the U.S . was itself responsible for 9/11. According to a Scripps News > story by Thomas Hargrove and Guido H. Stempel III, who cited a new > Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll, "More than a third of the > American > public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist > attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could > go to > war in the Middle East,." >> >> The actual figures were that 16 percent thought it was "very likely" > that "People in the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 > attacks or took no action to stop the attacks because they wanted the > United States to go to war in the Middle East." The figure of 20 > percent > thought it was "somewhat likely." That brings the total to 36 percent > who believe the federal government assisted in the 9/11 attacks. >> >> According to a release from a member of the 9/11 Truth movement, the > C-SPAN show was "a rare break in a monolithic media façade supporting > the official conspiracy theory of 9/11." That "conspiracy theory" is > that Arabs/Muslims did it. The release said that the truth about 9/11, > which is that the U.S. Government was itself responsible for the > attacks, has been censored by "right-wing cheerleaders for foreign > wars" > and even leftist "gatekeepers." >> >> The event featured charges by a member of the audience that The >> Nation > magazine and Amy Goodman on the left-wing of the political spectrum > are > part of the conspiracy to keep the truth from the American people. >> >> Tarpley, author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, said that > C-SPAN's decision to air the panel was a sign that "a faction of the > ruling class may actually desire to turn back from the catastrophic > abyss of thermonuclear World War III." He added, "The official 9/11 > Big > Lie is collapsing around the ears of Bush, Cheney, the neo-cons, > and the > invisibles who run them." >> >> Tarpley said C-SPAN deserves credit for having "completely destroyed" > the 9/11 "myth." >> >> The problem for this "truth" movement, of course, is that the > architects of 9/11 claimed credit for the attacks in interviews with > Al-Jazeera, which has been consistently serving as an organ of al > Qaeda. > There's absolutely no reason to doubt this evidence, which comes from > the horse's mouth. We'll have more on that in another commentary. >> >> Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report >> > > > > > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ > > Please let us stay on topic and be civil. > > OM > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
