Bob, Call me crazy, but in the first film and stills after the pentahit, I neither saw the impact marks of the wings of a commercial jet on the building's facade, nor did I see the impact marks of the hardest things on the jet - the engines. If you see the film of the 2nd jet hitting the south WTC tower, you clearly see the impact marks of the wings and engines in addition to the fuselage. I am sorry but it is the little sloppy details that just make me nuts.
I am not looking to start a series of flames over this. I am just saying that I am not convinced by the arguments heretofore. This would be cleared up nicely if all the confiscated film of what happened at the Pentagon were released; but I do not have much hope in that happening. Meanwhile I see no reason for people to be so damned sure of what happened without all of the evidence. Hiding evidence is certainly not the action of a government that is concerned with getting to the truth. --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "muckblit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Vigilius Haufniensis" > <thehatefulnerd@> wrote: > > > > according to loose change the engine part that was at the scene was > too small for that type of plane. > > Some people just keep regurgitating and recirculating the same lies. > > The notion that the part was too small is based on initial speculation > that it is from the fan stage. As usual, lightweights never ventured > beyond that speculation, contenting themselves to adopt speculation as > conclusion without every looking at the facts, or perhaps ignoring the > facts for pay or attention. The part in question is from the > compressor stage, not the fan stage. Wheels in the compressor stage > are smaller. There is a Rolls-Royce engine diagram for that model of > engine which is only on American Airlines 757's, not others, and it > shows that very part. > > You can see a man standing near the part. You can scale the part to > the diagram. It is a perfect match: > > http://www.earth-citizens.net/pages-en/wr-eng.html > > Now you know a fact. > > -Bob Dodds >
