> Nicolas Williams wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:48:12PM -0500, Doug Leavitt wrote: >>> We currently set an upper bounds of 512k max for a buffer. >> >> Perhaps we should truncate the group membership list rather than fail >> the whole operation. Such a failure mode is much more graceful than the >> current one. >> >> Would that be a simple fix? >> >> Nico On 9/30/08 5:28 PM, "Doug Leavitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. That would violate POSIX specifications for the getXbyY APIs, > which we do not want to do. > > As I specified previously, we've investigated this, and the correct fix > is to allow the system to be configured in a manner that a change in > configuration can only take affect upon reboot. > > The plan is to do this via smf/nscd, but has not been implemented. > > DOug.
So currently, what do users who have LDAP groups larger then ~200 users use for centralized naming? Are we using nss_ldap incorrectly? Or is the nss_ldap/nscd group member limit just set extremely low? Please help! :) _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
