On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:28:59PM -0500, Doug Leavitt wrote: > No. That would violate POSIX specifications for the getXbyY APIs, > which we do not want to do.
I actually have a hard time believing that we couldn't have an option to do what I proposed. We have plenty of options that, when enabled, result in standards violations, and that's OK provided that the option defaults to off. Nico > As I specified previously, we've investigated this, and the correct fix > is to allow the system to be configured in a manner that a change in > configuration can only take affect upon reboot. > > The plan is to do this via smf/nscd, but has not been implemented. > > DOug. > > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:48:12PM -0500, Doug Leavitt wrote: > >>We currently set an upper bounds of 512k max for a buffer. > > > >Perhaps we should truncate the group membership list rather than fail > >the whole operation. Such a failure mode is much more graceful than the > >current one. > > > >Would that be a simple fix? > > > >Nico _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
