On 10/03/08 12:21, HUGE | Rob Terhaar wrote: > On 10/3/08 3:01 PM, "Daniel Liebster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The results reain the same from a windows XP SP3 client. I've attached the >> output of the script that hows the performance disparity of the CIFS-server. >> The script takes twice as long to run against the OpenSolairs CIFS-server >> compared to Windows2003 Server, or the HW filer. >> -- >> This message posted from opensolaris.org > > Which SNV version are you using? There have been a number of performance > enhancements after snv86. (like this one: > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6686647 ) > > We've been using snv91 with good success.
The gendiag output indicates snv_95. Alan _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
