Dan, Thanks, this will be useful. I should be able to use dtrace profiling to identify problem areas.
Alan -- On 10/10/08 13:08, Daniel Liebster wrote: > Here is a c++ program that also shows the performance gap. > Completion time against a BlueArc fileserver is 9 seconds. > Completion time against a Windows Fileserver is 7 seconds. > Completion time against CIFS-server svn_98 is greater than 500 seconds > > The attached is the c source for the executable used to generate the 16MB > file(genbinfile.c), and the cpp source for the executable that runs the > actual test(binary.file.test.cpp). > > The screen-grab from the XP client show the first curve of activity against > the Windows server, the second curve against the BlueArc, and the third long > curve against the CIFS Server. > > The current version of MinGW gcc and g++ was used to compile the > programs.(gcc version 3.4.5 (mingw-vista special r3)) > > no flags to gcc for the file generator exe, > c:\MinGW\bin\g++ -I"d:/cppPgms" -c -Wall -O binary.file.test.cpp > c:\MinGW\bin\g++ -obinary.file.test.cpp.exe -Wall -O > binary.file.test.o > > to compile the c++ test exe. > > binary.file.test.exe then takes the location of the test file as its argument. > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > cifs-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
