The example in the manual is not pointless but it assumes that
you set the permissions in a way that gives access to connected
users and that's basically part of your file system settings
rather than CIFS configuration.

Does the connected user has enough access permissions on fs2_sub?

Afshin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Afshin, All,
> 
> Thanks for that. Just for my sanity. If I read the CR it look like
> something much more complex that I am actually trying to do. Basically I
> am just following the example in the manual here:
> 
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2429/createstaticsmbsharezfstask?a=view
> 
> # zfs create -o casesensitivity=mixed -o nbmand=on pardatapool/fs2
> # zfs set sharesmb=name=myshare pardatapool/fs2
> # sharemgr show -vp
> default nfs=()
>         /pardatapool/incoming ""
> zfs
>     zfs/pardatapool/fs2 smb=()
>         myshare=/pardatapool/fs2
> # zfs create -o casesensitivity=mixed -o nbmand=on pardatapool/fs2/fs2_sub
> # sharemgr show -vp
> default nfs=()
>         /pardatapool/incoming ""
> zfs
>     zfs/pardatapool/fs2 smb=()
>         myshare=/pardatapool/fs2
>         myshare_fs2_sub=/pardatapool/fs2/fs2_sub
> #
> 
> And this already cause a "Access denied" when accessing "fs2_sub" on the
> windows client. Is the example in the manual just pointless?
> 
> Thanks in advice,
> 
> ..Remco
> 
>> You can monitor 6711751 bug ID in bugs.opensolaris.org
>>
>> There is no PSARC case yet but we might need to file one
>> to get some support from ZFS for DFS links. We will know
>> when we start the design phase.
>>
>> Afshin
>>
>> Remco Lengers wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Any idea when " the Solaris SMB server gets support for DFS"? Any where
>>> that I can follow the development? Any PSARC case that I can follow?
>>>
>>> ..Remco
>>>
>>> The answer to my original question was:
>>>
>>> ------
>>> True, there's no mount-point crossing, but Windows/CIFS does support DFS
>>> referrals.  The Solaris SMB server does not support DFS yet though.
>>>
>>> So you're correct: shared nested filesystems on the server side do not
>>> look like that on the client side.  When the Solaris SMB server gets
>>> support for DFS then this situation will change.
>>> ------
>>>
>>> My original question was:
>>>
>>> ------
>>>
>>> please reply to me directly as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am migrating from my "old" sb100 S10 U2 home server to a new AMD x64
>>>
>>> Nevada build 100 server.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On my old server I had zfs fileystems like so:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> metronpool/dump/fotos  60.6G  13.3G  36.5K  /metronpool/dump/fotos
>>> metronpool/dump/fotos/2000   319M  13.3G   319M
>>> /metronpool/dump/fotos/2000
>>> metronpool/dump/fotos/2001   885M  13.3G   885M
>>> /metronpool/dump/fotos/2001
>>>
>>> .....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And then I had metronpool/dump/fotos shared with SAMBA to my PC's. This
>>> meant that all file systems under ../foto/.. were accessible just fine.
>>> It allowed me to access all filesystems via a single samba share.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now I am trying to set that up with Nevada, moving over and upgrading
>>> the zfs snapshots no problem
>>>
>>> pardatapool/export/fotos       60.4G   723G    29K
>>> /pardatapool/export/fotos
>>> pardatapool/export/fotos/2000   319M   723G   318M
>>> /pardatapool/export/fotos/2000
>>> pardatapool/export/fotos/2001   886M   723G   885M
>>> /pardatapool/export/fotos/2001
>>>
>>> zfs set sharesmb=on pardatapool/export/foto
>>>
>>> # sharemgr show
>>>
>>> default
>>>
>>> zfs
>>>
>>>    zfs/pardatapool/export/fotos
>>>          /pardatapool/export/fotos
>>>          /pardatapool/export/fotos/2000
>>>          /pardatapool/export/fotos/2001
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> All looks fine however when I try to access the smb share on my pc's I
>>> get "access or permission denied" when wanting to access the 2000 and
>>> 2001 "directories".
>>>
>>> Any idea what I am doing wrong?
>>>
>>> ------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cifs-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> cifs-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cifs-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to