Afshin, All,

The example below demonstrates the issue. I don't think there is a 
permission problem:


C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>
C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>net use L: \\par\myshare
The command completed successfully.


C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>net use
New connections will be remembered.


Status       Local     Remote                    Network

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK           L:        \\par\myshare             Microsoft Windows Network
The command completed successfully.

C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>dir l:\
 Volume in drive L is pardatapool
 Volume Serial Number is C4BA-C348

 Directory of l:\

31-10-2008  21:06    <DIR>          .
31-10-2008  19:20    <DIR>          ..
31-10-2008  19:21    <DIR>          fs2_sub
               0 File(s)              0 bytes
               3 Dir(s)  776.689.580.544 bytes free

C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>dir l:\fs2_sub
 Volume in drive L is pardatapool
 Volume Serial Number is C4BA-C348

 Directory of l:\fs2_sub

File Not Found

C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>copy c:\autoexec.bat l:\
        1 file(s) copied.

C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>copy c:\autoexec.bat l:\fs2_sub\
Access is denied.
        0 file(s) copied.

C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>
C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>net use k: \\par\myshare_fs2_sub
The command completed successfully.


C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>copy c:\autoexec.bat k:\
        1 file(s) copied.


C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>net use
New connections will be remembered.


Status       Local     Remote                    Network

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK           K:        \\PAR\MYSHARE_FS2_SUB     Microsoft Windows Network
OK           L:        \\par\myshare             Microsoft Windows Network
The command completed successfully.


C:\Documents and Settings\remcol>

Regards,

..Remco

Afshin Salek wrote:
> The example in the manual is not pointless but it assumes that
> you set the permissions in a way that gives access to connected
> users and that's basically part of your file system settings
> rather than CIFS configuration.
>
> Does the connected user has enough access permissions on fs2_sub?
>
> Afshin
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi Afshin, All,
>>
>> Thanks for that. Just for my sanity. If I read the CR it look like
>> something much more complex that I am actually trying to do. Basically I
>> am just following the example in the manual here:
>>
>> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2429/createstaticsmbsharezfstask?a=view 
>>
>>
>> # zfs create -o casesensitivity=mixed -o nbmand=on pardatapool/fs2
>> # zfs set sharesmb=name=myshare pardatapool/fs2
>> # sharemgr show -vp
>> default nfs=()
>>       /pardatapool/incoming    ""
>> zfs
>>     zfs/pardatapool/fs2 smb=()
>>       myshare=/pardatapool/fs2
>> # zfs create -o casesensitivity=mixed -o nbmand=on 
>> pardatapool/fs2/fs2_sub
>> # sharemgr show -vp
>> default nfs=()
>>       /pardatapool/incoming    ""
>> zfs
>>     zfs/pardatapool/fs2 smb=()
>>       myshare=/pardatapool/fs2
>>       myshare_fs2_sub=/pardatapool/fs2/fs2_sub
>> #
>>
>> And this already cause a "Access denied" when accessing "fs2_sub" on the
>> windows client. Is the example in the manual just pointless?
>>
>> Thanks in advice,
>>
>> ..Remco
>>
>>> You can monitor 6711751 bug ID in bugs.opensolaris.org
>>>
>>> There is no PSARC case yet but we might need to file one
>>> to get some support from ZFS for DFS links. We will know
>>> when we start the design phase.
>>>
>>> Afshin
>>>
>>> Remco Lengers wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Any idea when " the Solaris SMB server gets support for DFS"? Any 
>>>> where
>>>> that I can follow the development? Any PSARC case that I can follow?
>>>>
>>>> ..Remco
>>>>
>>>> The answer to my original question was:
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>> True, there's no mount-point crossing, but Windows/CIFS does 
>>>> support DFS
>>>> referrals.  The Solaris SMB server does not support DFS yet though.
>>>>
>>>> So you're correct: shared nested filesystems on the server side do not
>>>> look like that on the client side.  When the Solaris SMB server gets
>>>> support for DFS then this situation will change.
>>>> ------
>>>>
>>>> My original question was:
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>>
>>>> please reply to me directly as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am migrating from my "old" sb100 S10 U2 home server to a new AMD x64
>>>>
>>>> Nevada build 100 server.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On my old server I had zfs fileystems like so:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> metronpool/dump/fotos  60.6G  13.3G  36.5K  /metronpool/dump/fotos
>>>> metronpool/dump/fotos/2000   319M  13.3G   319M
>>>> /metronpool/dump/fotos/2000
>>>> metronpool/dump/fotos/2001   885M  13.3G   885M
>>>> /metronpool/dump/fotos/2001
>>>>
>>>> .....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And then I had metronpool/dump/fotos shared with SAMBA to my PC's. 
>>>> This
>>>> meant that all file systems under ../foto/.. were accessible just 
>>>> fine.
>>>> It allowed me to access all filesystems via a single samba share.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now I am trying to set that up with Nevada, moving over and upgrading
>>>> the zfs snapshots no problem
>>>>
>>>> pardatapool/export/fotos       60.4G   723G    29K
>>>> /pardatapool/export/fotos
>>>> pardatapool/export/fotos/2000   319M   723G   318M
>>>> /pardatapool/export/fotos/2000
>>>> pardatapool/export/fotos/2001   886M   723G   885M
>>>> /pardatapool/export/fotos/2001
>>>>
>>>> zfs set sharesmb=on pardatapool/export/foto
>>>>
>>>> # sharemgr show
>>>>
>>>> default
>>>>
>>>> zfs
>>>>
>>>>    zfs/pardatapool/export/fotos
>>>>          /pardatapool/export/fotos
>>>>          /pardatapool/export/fotos/2000
>>>>          /pardatapool/export/fotos/2001
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> All looks fine however when I try to access the smb share on my pc's I
>>>> get "access or permission denied" when wanting to access the 2000 and
>>>> 2001 "directories".
>>>>
>>>> Any idea what I am doing wrong?
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cifs-discuss mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cifs-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cifs-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to