On 12/01/08 14:20, LEES, Cooper wrote:
> SMB Devs,
> 
> In regards to my problem in staying 'joined' to a domain our DNS here at 
> ANSTO only allows the domain controllers to do DDNS with BIND. Could 
> this cause any problems?
> 
> I have ddns_enable set to false in sharectl:
> ddns_enable=false

That shouldn't make any difference or cause a problem.

Provided the forward and reverse lookup entries for the host
are present in your DNS, it shouldn't matter how they got there.

Alan

> I have not rebooted or restarted the server since last email to the list 
> but when I last checked it was still not a member of the domain after a 
> reboot etc.
> 
> Regards,
> ---
> Cooper Ry Lees
> UNIX Evangelist - Information Management Services (IMS)
> Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
> T  +61 2 9717 3853
> F  +61 2 9717 9273
> M  +61 403 739 446
> E  [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> www.ansto.gov.au <http://www.ansto.gov.au>
> 
> **Important****: ***This transmission is intended only for the use of 
> the addressee. It is confidential and may contain privileged information 
> or copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient, any use or 
> further disclosure of this communication is strictly forbidden. If you 
> have received this transmission in error, please notify me immediately 
> by telephone and delete all copies of this transmission as well as any 
> attachments.*
> 
> On 02/12/2008, at 7:48 AM, Ross Smith wrote:
> 
>> No major mistakes then, cool :-)
>>
>> I'll add the ddns stuff to my notes and test it out, I can definately
>> see that being useful to know.
>>
>> Regarding the hostname, I think it is done with the OpenSolaris
>> installer, but not with the one currently included in snv.  That
>> installer doesn't prompt for a host name at any point although it does
>> create a (blank) hostname.e1000g0 file.
>>
>> And I'll look forward to the Kerberos updates.  CIFS is certainly
>> pretty smooth these days, much easier than it was to begin with, and
>> really not much more complicated than setting up a windows server.  I
>> just thought I'd best check my notes since I aware I'm testing a
>> moving target here :)
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Alan M Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> I thought step 2 was done by the installer but I could be wrong.
>>>
>>> Step 3 shouldn't be necessary if you enable dynamic DNS updates
>>> prior to enabling the CIFS service:
>>>
>>>       sharectl set -p ddns_enable=true smb
>>>       svcadm enable -r smb/server
>>>
>>> There appears to be a bug in BIND, which prevents it from making
>>> dynamic DNS updates on ADS.  There is an open bug with ISC.
>>> So we perform the updates from within the CIFS service.
>>>
>>> We are looking into ways of handling the Kerberos situation more
>>> elegantly.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>> --
>>>
>>> On 12/01/08 06:36, Ross wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just wanted to check if my experience of joining a domain with 
>>>> snv_103 is
>>>> correct.  Am I making any obvious mistakes here, and are there plans to
>>>> simplify any of these steps (2, 3 & 5 look to me like they could be 
>>>> covered
>>>> by the installer)?
>>>>
>>>> 1. Install Solaris, configuring kerberos, DNS, etc.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Configure a hostname, since this doesn't appear to be covered by the
>>>> install.
>>>> edit /etc/hostname.e1000g0
>>>>
>>>> 3. Load your AD DNS tool and add the hostname and IP address since 
>>>> Solaris
>>>> doesn't appear to register it's IP with the server.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Synchronise time with the domain with:
>>>> # ntpdate server
>>>>
>>>> 5. Edit the krb5.conf file, since there appear to be settings missed 
>>>> here
>>>> too.  Ensure the default realm is in CAPS, and set [domain_realm] as 
>>>> .domain
>>>> = REALM, eg:
>>>> [domain_realm]
>>>> .domain.local = DOMAIN.LOCAL
>>>>
>>>> 6. Start the service
>>>> # svcadm enable -r smb/server
>>>>
>>>> 7. Join the domain
>>>> # smbadm join -u user domain
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cifs-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cifs-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to