The glob is evaluated on the client, even with SMB, IIRC. That would
mean the problem is on the client.
But when I copy my test-directory of my first post to a linux box, shared with
samba version
SSEMWS:~ # smbd -V
Version 3.0.28-0.5-1657-SUSE-CODE10
everything is working fine (on exactly the same W7-client!):
C:\>dir \\ssemws\kunden\temp\test\
Datenträger in Laufwerk \\ssemws\kunden: ist kunden
Volumeseriennummer: 0B79-0989
Verzeichnis von \\ssemws\kunden\temp\test
10.04.2012 10:45<DIR> .
10.04.2012 10:45<DIR> ..
06.10.2011 11:14 0 FILENAME1_TEXT.txt
06.10.2011 11:15 0 FILENAME3_ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ.txt
08.11.2011 12:15 0 FILENAME4_üöäÜÖħ.txta
08.11.2011 11:50 0 not_a_folder
06.10.2011 11:15<DIR> FOLDER1
06.10.2011 11:15 0 FILENAME2_§§§§§§§§.txt
08.11.2011 11:50<DIR> is.a.folder.txt
06.10.2011 11:15<DIR> FOLDER2
5 Datei(en), 0 Bytes
5 Verzeichnis(se), 441.759.458.304 Bytes frei
C:\>dir \\ssemws\kunden\temp\test\*_*.*
Datenträger in Laufwerk \\ssemws\kunden: ist kunden
Volumeseriennummer: 0B79-0989
Verzeichnis von \\ssemws\kunden\temp\test
06.10.2011 11:14 0 FILENAME1_TEXT.txt
06.10.2011 11:15 0 FILENAME3_ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ.txt
08.11.2011 12:15 0 FILENAME4_üöäÜÖħ.txta
08.11.2011 11:50 0 not_a_folder
06.10.2011 11:15 0 FILENAME2_§§§§§§§§.txt
5 Datei(en), 0 Bytes
0 Verzeichnis(se), 441.758.746.624 Bytes frei
I've also tested another linux box with samba-Version
ssetk1:~ # smbd -V
Version 3.0.10-SUSE
giving the same results as above: everything is working fine on the same
client. Only the Solaris-based cifs-servers do have the problem.
Thanks,
Martin
_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
cifs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
