On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 13:59 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > As per our previous conversation regarding NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40, > I wanted to send you a proposed update to the documentation to see if this > resolves the issue. The current MS-ADTS documentation for section 7.3.3.2 > Domain Controller Response to an LDAP Ping reads as follows: > > If the server is configured to respond to ping requests in the form of a > NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 structure (the way in which the server is > configured is outside the state model and is implementation-dependent), and v > does not have the NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_AVOID_NT4EMUL bit set, the response of > the dc is documented in "Response to Invalid Filter" (section 7.3.3.3). > > The proposed update to this text is as follows: > > If the server is configured to respond to ping requests in the form of a > NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 structure (the way in which the server is > configured is outside the state model and is implementation-dependent), and v > does not have the NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_AVOID_NT4EMUL bit set, the server uses > the NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 structure to send the response back. > > The intended changes highlights that if the server is configured to respond > to ping request using the NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 structure, then > that is what the client will receive. It also intends to leave open how this > is implemented so that you the implementer can decide how this gets > enabled/disabled. Please let us know if this resolves your issue and we will > update the documentation accordingly.
We seem to be going in circles, perhaps because MS-ADTS does not have a 'windows behaviour' section. Why is it so hard to list the reasons (for the 'implementation dependent behaviour' we discussed on the phone? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
