On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 06:54 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > We appreciate your feedback. We have re-considered this section of > the document and will be updating the MS-ADTS document section 7.3.3.2 > as follows: > > Original Text > > If the server is configured to respond to ping requests in the form of > a NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 structure (the way in which the > server is configured is outside the state model and is > implementation-dependent), and v does not have the > NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_AVOID_NT4EMUL bit set, the response of the dc is > documented in "Response to Invalid Filter" (section 7.3.3.3). > > Updated Text > > If the server is configured to respond to ping requests in the form of > a NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 structure, and v does not have the > NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_AVOID_NT4EMUL bit set (for an informative example > of how and why this is configured in the Windows implementation, see > [KB298713]), the server uses the NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 > structure to send the response back. > > An informative reference will also be added to the documentation under > 1.2.2 Informative References, and will read > [KB298713] Microsoft Corporation, "How to prevent overloading on the > first domain controller during domain upgrade", > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/298713 > > Let us know if you have any further questions?
That seems to cover the situation nicely. If (and I suspect we may well) we implement Samba3 to Samba4 upgrades in a similar manner (allowing a partial migration), this will be very useful information. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
