Change request for [MS-NRPC]: NETLOGON_VALIDATION_SAM_INFO4 Structure Member Derivations and References ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.4.13) Status is that the information in the PasswordPolicyAndValidation.pdf document will not become part of the [MS-NRPC] document. This is because of the unwieldy amount of inter-document cross references in the tables.
Change request for [MS-SAMR]: Password Policy Checks ([MS-SAMR] 3.1.5.14.2) 3. Password Validation Attributes ([MS-SAMR] 5.2) - Documentation development has not yet responded; I have alerted them concerning this. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Bill Wesse Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:18 AM To: 'Andrew Bartlett' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Resend: Response: SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information Good morning Andrew. I have created document change requests, using the attached document as a source. The 3 topics below, from the attached document, have been submitted against the noted open protocol docs. I will keep you advised of progress. Thanks for your patience! Change request for [MS-NRPC] created: 1. NETLOGON_VALIDATION_SAM_INFO4 Structure Member Derivations and References ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.4.13) Change request for [MS-SAMR] created: 2. Password Policy Checks ([MS-SAMR] 3.1.5.14.2) 3. Password Validation Attributes ([MS-SAMR] 5.2) Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Bill Wesse Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 2:37 PM To: 'Andrew Bartlett' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Resend: Response: SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information Hi Andrew. I hope interop & SNIA went well (I heard some positive feedback on the interop, but SNIA is outside my working set <g>). I am the sole author of PasswordPolicyAndValidation.pdf - and gather you are interested in the entire set of tables & information in it being inserted into the appropriate documents. So, I will proceed to file document change requests as applicable, using PasswordPolicyAndValidation.pdf as the source for change proposals. I wish I could say that the pdf will serve as a model - but I do know there is an ongoing conversation here about top-down versus bottom-up documentation style & content. I recognize much of the AD documentation is bottom-up, which doesn't provide the most straightforward route to an implementation... Hence that other document I sent a (very) rough copy of a while back ([SCENARIO_DOMAIN_TRUST].pdf - which currently deconstructs most of the wired operations & some of data flow for trusts). As I noted in a separate email, I expect to be able to provide you with the latest copy soon. How much of that doc will end up on other forthcoming items under development is currently a big unknown. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 4:53 PM To: Bill Wesse Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Resend: Response: SRX080909600334: [MS-APDS] Backing store and policy application information On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 08:09 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > Good morning again Andrew! I am resending this since I have not > received a response to my email of Sept 26. Could you advise me > concerning how you would like the document to read? > > Good morning Andrew. I have completed my preliminary investigation > concerning your questions about password policy, validation and > concrete backing store for user and trust account attributes. I'm so sorry I didn't get back to you. As I said to everyone else (at the interop and SNIA events), I just wish the rest of the documentation was so clear and provided such a useful mapping. Very well done! Now, what is the long-term status of this document, and how can we make it a modal for other protocols? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
