On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 06:00 -0800, Bill Wesse wrote: > Andrew - I again thank you for your patience, on behalf of myself and our > documentation team. > > SRX080902600070 [MS-ADSO]: LSA and trusted domains overview > A document improvement suggestion has been filed against '[MS-ADSO]: Active > Directory System Overview' with regards to the > 'PasswordPolicyAndValidation.pdf' file I previously provided to you. The > improvement suggestion is to include the appropriate information within the > overview document. > > SRX080909600334 [MS-AUTHSO] Backing store and policy application info > A document improvement suggestion has been filed against '[MS-AUTHSO]: > Windows Authentication Services System Overview' with regards to the > [SCENARIO_DOMAIN_TRUST].pdf file I previously provided to you. The > improvement suggestion is to include the appropriate information within the > overview document. > > I will follow up this week with an updated [SCENARIO_DOMAIN_TRUST].pdf, > containing unencrypted network packet data. I regret I was not previously > able to provide the unencrypted packets; I just completed a significant > amount of work concerning test hotfix creation, as well as source research to > locate encryption control for the various protocols. > > Unless you indicate otherwise, I will archive the above noted cases. It has > been a pleasure serving you in this matter. Thanks for helping us improve our > documentation!
Sorry, but I'm rather confused. Should I have MS-AUTHSO and MS-ADSO already? What do you mean in saying that you will 'archive' this request? Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
