Andrew - I will get a copy of the [MS-ADSO] document to you as soon as possible 
(this was previewed at the January plugfest). [MS-AUTHSO] is not currently 
available for preview; it is still in the plan/design stage, so there is no 
content yet.

Archiving a case is synonymous with closing it; at this point, there are no 
more actions I can take with respect to the cases on your behalf (except for 
the updated [SCENARIO_DOMAIN_TRUST].pdf document, which I will forward to you 
later this week.

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:  +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:  +1(704) 665-9606

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:12 PM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: Status of SRX080902600070 (trusted domains overview) and 
SRX080909600334 (backing store / policy)

On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 06:00 -0800, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Andrew - I again thank you for your patience, on behalf of myself and our 
> documentation team.
> 
> SRX080902600070 [MS-ADSO]: LSA and trusted domains overview A document 
> improvement suggestion has been filed against '[MS-ADSO]: Active Directory 
> System Overview' with regards to the 'PasswordPolicyAndValidation.pdf' file I 
> previously provided to you. The improvement suggestion is to include the 
> appropriate information within the overview document.
> 
> SRX080909600334 [MS-AUTHSO] Backing store and policy application info 
> A document improvement suggestion has been filed against '[MS-AUTHSO]: 
> Windows Authentication Services System Overview' with regards to the 
> [SCENARIO_DOMAIN_TRUST].pdf file I previously provided to you. The 
> improvement suggestion is to include the appropriate information within the 
> overview document.
> 
> I will follow up this week with an updated [SCENARIO_DOMAIN_TRUST].pdf, 
> containing unencrypted network packet data. I regret I was not previously 
> able to provide the unencrypted packets; I just completed a significant 
> amount of work concerning test hotfix creation, as well as source research to 
> locate encryption control for the various protocols.
> 
> Unless you indicate otherwise, I will archive the above noted cases. It has 
> been a pleasure serving you in this matter. Thanks for helping us improve our 
> documentation!

Sorry, but I'm rather confused.  Should I have MS-AUTHSO and MS-ADSO already?  
What do you mean in saying that you will 'archive' this request?

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to