Den 29.05.2023 22:47, skrev Phyllis Smith:
More feedback to add to Andrew's reply.
Using Deinterlace creates a dvd.mpg file only marginally larger than
without deinterlacing.
But the result is visually better than without deinterlacing, which
is awful jagged at camera movements zoom/pan, at least on my
2560x1440 res monitor using VLC.
I do not understand the above sentence. Which result is better? with
deinterlacing or without deinterlacing? So Progressive is better?
which makes more sense to me in this day and age. As far as I read on
the internet, DVDs can be either Progressive or Interlaced.
Leaving it dvd rendering interlaced is worst jagged; selecting
deinterlaced is better both with default mpeg2enc ("TFF, interlaced")
and optional FFMpeg (progressive). Some of the jagged edges and lines is
expected to be caused by the scaled up low vertical SD wide resolution.
I didn't notice visible +/- chroma difference by selecting "use yuv420p
dvd deinterlace format"
I will try to compare with DeVeDe's deinterlace YADIF filter and two
pass rendering.
(DeVeDe's second FFMPEG deinterlace filter exited the dvd rendering.)
I also do a test with
--
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
