>> I didn't understand what the 17122023 patch brings again. > Without the patch you can not render 10 or 12 bit.
I meant whether the 0010 patch only served termux or changed the libraries as well, because I experienced a very high rendering speed increase (about 10/20 fps more). That's a very big jump (and welcome!). > I am trying to get 3 things all ready to test on other systems -- HDR, libaom > 3.8, and x265 -- so when I do, I will check to make sure multibit compile > works there too and make it a default. Even if it takes longer for me. At > one point I thought that if you rendered 8-bit on the multibit x265, it would > result in a bigger file than on the build non-multibit system. But I did a > render test today and the files were exactly the same. As you said, for me also the size of the files obtained with the multibit and std versions is identical, as is the quality (to the eye) of the video. The rendering speed is similar (just faster the std version, but by a little). I would be for eliminating the std version and using only the multibit, but on this point I would like to hear everyone's opinion. @Andrew: could you tell me again all the patches to use to test libaom? @Phyllis: the build times depend only on the CPU, why don't you use the more equipped system (the Epyc)? You would do builds in 1 to 2 minutes, versus 7 to 10 minutes on the laptop. You could virtualize the various distros by giving them as much CPU and RAM. -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
