On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:04:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.08.2006, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Nicolas:
> 
> > OK. So, if I open a "made with the patched version" project with the
> > "normal" 836 version, only the way the input and output points are
> > displayed would be changed, wouldn't they?
> > 
> exactly

I edited my project with the patched version, and opened again that
project with the "normal" cvs version. There's no problem at all: the
curves seem ok, and I'm able to edit them without any problem. It's only
a "cosmetic" change in the way the keyframes input and output points are
displayed.

> > Your patch is *REALLY* important for me. That's because I work on a long
> > video which will contains around 1000 keyframes.
> same for me
> 
> > However, that project is a "long term" project. It'll be finish in
> > around 2 months, but I have to be able to edit it again in some years.
> Same for me, also a "long term" project. I'm determined to use the
> patch myself and I will try to get it into the official codebase,
> if this is possible. So you can count on me!

So, I tried the patched version. I already changed some keyframes. I was
able to get a straight line between keyframes. With the normal version,
it took more time and was not that precise.

However, I still have to continue to use it to completely find how it
works with the patched version. I'll tell you if I find any bug or
strange behaviour.

In my opinion, your patch is so important it really should get into the
cvs codebase!!! Keyframes curves are far easier to edit with your patched
version.

Thank you very much! 

Nicolas, Paris.

_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

Reply via email to