Hi, On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:02, muzzol wrote: > 2007/1/31, Andraž Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > i believe there was talk about _exactly_ this few months ago on this > > list.
Yes :) I'm happily read this thread and will happily maintain cinelerra in
debian once the licence issues are resolved.
BTW, last time I looked there were also quite some libaries copied into the
cinelerra sourcetree - this is bad from a maintainance point of view
(security patches need to be applied many times) but this also effects the
debian/copyright file: the author of every software included and its licence
need to be mentioned there.
> > It was resolved by someone contacting Adam and getting clearance for the
> > code he wrote. Now someone must check if there are any other files in
> > the tree and clear up all of the cases.
>
> yes. there's no grey areas here. we have the confirmation.
Aeh, did Adam really write _all_ the code (from those files without GPL
statements)? He only gave clarification for the code he wrote.
This is still serious progress (cheers!) but - as I understand it - we are not
there yet.
regards,
Holger
pgpJc0M3Cfgao.pgp
Description: PGP signature
