On Tuesday 30 January 2007 23:40, muzzol wrote: > hi again, > > im sad to see no developers are answering. this is really serious, in > fact it could be a GPL license violation and is as simple to resolv as > applying a simple patch. > > this is mainly focused to developers but i would like to hear oppinions > here.
1. If the license text is in the root directory of the source code, it is made absolutely clear how the source code thereunder is licensed. It is in no way necessary to write a license preamble in each and every file. 2. I take licenses series. But that does not mean that I'm going to look whether any code in the cinelerra directory is violating the license. Almost all of the code was written by someone else. 3. I will not waste my time writing preambles into files. 4. Your religion (Debina+Ubuntu+FSF) does not conflict with mine (briefly outlined above). Therefore, I see no reason to reject patches if you send them in. -- Hannes _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
