Well yes. Thats what we have to do. Go through every file to check for a license header. If theres none or a GLP header we're good. If there does happen to be one thats licensed otherwise we have to note that difference in the debian/copyright file.
Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote: > Maybe it's a stupid question, but how can you make sure a file is or > isn't gpl? Should there be a header in the file containing the license > of it's lgpl or other? > > Regards, > > Jeroen > > Cory K. schreef: >> Ok. So heres what its coming down to. We have to do a full review of >> _every_ file to make sure their all GPL. We cant take it on faith. The >> license file is good enough for the admins as long as the other files >> dont conflict. So if we come across 1 file that is LGPL or Artistic >> licensed it will be rejected. >> >> We dont have to _add_ a license header for every file just make sure >> theres not one that conflicts. >> >> Nicolas Maufrais wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:54:58AM -0500, Cory K. wrote: >>> >>>> Look, in the end all we want is help. I havnt seen 1 post that >>>> gives us >>>> that. >>>> >>>> Lack of effort isnt the reason it hasnt made it into distros like >>>> Fedora >>>> or Debian. Their are issues. People may feel they are distro issues >>>> but >>>> they are issues none-the-less. Getting Cinelerra into distros >>>> repositories will only help Cinelerra. We are willing to do the >>>> work if >>>> you are willing to help. >>>> >>>> If anyone wants to be helpful please email me off-list or on IRC at >>>> #ubuntustudio on Freenode. >>>> >>> Don't be mistaken. There are a lot of people here who help others, >>> either by spending time developing, sharing their knowledge or helping >>> others to install or use Cinelerra. BTW, to all of them, I say: >>> *** THANKS *** =) >>> >>> Now, the fact that you don't receive immediate help shouldn't >>> discourage >>> you to improve things. That the way things work in the Open-Source >>> world. >>> >>> I gave you some hints and references in my last mail. I can't do more >>> right now, since I already spend enough time contributing each week and >>> have a life. I assume that's the same for developers, isn't it? >>> >>> I personnaly prefer Hannes, for example, to continue to improve/debug >>> Cinelerra than spending time on this licence issue, which can be solved >>> by people such as you (or me, if I wasn't already busy enough) for >>> example. >>> >>> Nicolas Maufrais. >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cinelerra mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > > > _______________________________________________ > Cinelerra mailing list > [email protected] > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
