On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 00:21 +0200, Herman Robak wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:32:01 +0200, Edouard Chalaron > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Well I am sorry, but the way icons look is of the last relevance > > > > I don't work better because icons look better. They could look better > > but I could not care less either. > > Same here. But people _will_ complain about the things they see, > perceive or understand. So we will keep hearing complaints about > the colours and the icons until they become more in style with the > flavour of the month.
We've had a similar debate in one of the Linux audio channels, about whether or not Linux soft synths should have "realistic" GUIs. Now me, I think it should be switchable - if I want a shiny groovy panel that looks *just like* a TB-303, then I should be able to turn that on and impress my Reason-using mates. For actually getting work done, I might want to turn it off, though. First impressions *do* count. Gordon _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
