Like I said, they still are looking what to do with it. I spoke some
people just days after they announced the termination of MainActor and
again somewhere in the second half of last year.
Yes, looking at the last answer it seems that they know that they have a
gem-stone, but are sitting on it for no other purpose that someone comes
by with a big enough pile of money. However, as time goes by, the
gem-stone (albeit biodegradable) is getting older and loses it's appeal
and with it it's value. Still, if enough people band together, have a
good idea, maybe MainConcept will give in.
But, I get the impression that Lumiera is around the corner, so why
waste time on an incompatible and aging product.
In my view, there are now only two things to be done:
* Make CV-Cinelerra more stable
* Getting Lumiera ready AND compatible with cv-cinelerra's project
files.
That's it for today folks.
Frans de Boer.
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 09:04 +0200, Riviere Informatique SARL wrote:
> Where did you get the idea they try to offload the codebase?
> I tried to get in contact with them about that but they showed no
> interest at all.
> If you have any info about that, please share.
>
> Regards,
> Steven van de Beek.
>
> Frans de Boer wrote:
> > Maybe just a silly Idea: Why not take the MainActor codebase? They stiil
> > seem to look for a good way to dispense with that codebase anyhow.
> > if it needs funding? I have no idea, but if it does...some of us in the
> > community might give some small or larger contributions without
> > over-demanding provisions.
> >
> > KR,
> > Frans de Boer.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 03:06 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
> >
> > > See my last mailing. Yes, I am new to this list. I was a MainActor adept
> > > and a Adobe Premiere (win32) before. Since MainActor has been killed
> > > off, I was looking for a viable successor. CV-Cinelerra seems to fit the
> > > bill - although a "for better or worse" feeling is creeping upon me.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Frans de Boer.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:18 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Hello dear reader,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can anyone tell me what this "lumiera" things is about? I have read
> > > > > many
> > > > > reactions on all kinds of questions - including my own - which somehow
> > > > > seem to be able to slip-in the word "lumiera". Please, humor me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Frans de Boer.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I guess you're just recently on the list. Lumiera by its previous name
> > > > was cinelerra 3. There is no working version of lumiera due for at
> > > > least
> > > > a year. It will be based, and will evolve from, cinelerra 2.x but with
> > > > a
> > > > completely remanufactured code base. A lot of the action is happening
> > > > on
> > > > this list which recently hosted the preliminary vote which came up with
> > > > the name lumiera (later ratified by further voting and a developers
> > > > meeting).
> > > >
> > > > hope that helps
> > > >
> > > > Graham
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cinelerra mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cinelerra mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cinelerra mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
