yes, it's probably (or absolutely) not correct to call Open Source the
binary of a source (wich is not open at all and not to mention this
binary is only for privative system)
i agree that opensource, more than a brand is some kind of revolution.
And we had to be carefull, when using this term, or we'll probably
lost that sense.
:)
Vale
And already there are lots of questions whether or not it really is
open source (yet?)
http://www.lightworksbeta.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=20&id=211&Itemid=202
-Heikki
2010/11/30 Raffaella Traniello <[email protected]>:
Ciao!
If you are interested, Lightworks Open Source beta is out available for
Windows to registered people.
http://www.lightworksbeta.com/
Ciao!
Raffaella
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
--
Ystävällisin terveisin,
Heikki Repo
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
