By V4L do you mean the possibility to record from /dev/video_n ? In my case that would be a disaster I am using it to scan film frames from a 1394 camera.
Cheers Edouard --- On Sat, 28/5/11, Simeon Völkel <[email protected]> wrote: From: Simeon Völkel <[email protected]> Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra on >=2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 support) To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, 28, May, 2011, 5:30 AM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, today i updated my kernel to 2.6.39 and was able to compile cinelerra after applying Nicola's patch from bugs.cinelerra.org to j6t's repo. In my opinion we should support recent kernels rather soon. So i wonder whether we have to keep v4l1 and buzz supported or whether removing support therefore (what Nicola's patch does) is fine, too. Personally speaking i would vote for the second choice as we have extremely limited resources for maintenance. However, if (and only if) this hardware should be still in use by Cinelerra users (please speak up if that's the case for you!) we should consider adding an option to configure. Regardless wheter we want to make support optional or remove it completely, i suggest to release a new version of cinelerra (2.1.6?) supporting linux kernels >=2.6.39 as soon as possible. What is you opinion on that? Regards, Simeon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3f378ACgkQph/voQkhF7wY2QCfbmllYDUFhhQALALNdzJJT642 2YEAoMa4VCHslFLFwMqp7aN6/WeeoqqX =4oJ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
