Have you tested the patch? It looks it will fail because it doesn't remove support for iOmega Buzz (that my patch did).
> Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra on >=2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 > support) > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 15:06:33 -0700 > > For those in ubuntu 11.04, or any newer distribution with kernel >= 2.6.38, > please do: > # apt-get install libv4l-dev > > And apply the attached patch. > > I'm not linking cinelerra with libv4l1, so you should LD_PRELOAD it in > order to use V4L in kernel >= 2.6.38. > > If you're using an older kernel, V4L support should keep working as before. > > Best regards, > Rafael Diniz > > > > V4L1 is the deprecated and now removed from kernel programming interface > > to access video/image devices. > > BUT the V4L1 interface can be supported via the libv4l version 0.8.3 > > onwards, as it that can do this conversion between the old API for the new > > (V4L2) API. > > I think that we should link cinelerra against libv4l1 if libv4l is > > present, otherwise, do not compile V4L support. > > > > Have you tried swaping "linux/videodev.h" by "libv4l1-videodev.h"? > > > > ; ) > > > > > > Best regards, > > Rafael Diniz > > > > > >> By V4L do you mean the possibility to record from /dev/video_n ? > >> In my case that would be a disaster I am using it to scan film frames > >> from > >> a 1394 camera. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Edouard > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> --- On Sat, 28/5/11, Simeon Völkel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> From: Simeon Völkel <[email protected]> > >> Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra on >=2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 > >> support) > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Saturday, 28, May, 2011, 5:30 AM > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> today i updated my kernel to 2.6.39 and was able to compile cinelerra > >> after > >> applying Nicola's patch from bugs.cinelerra.org to j6t's repo. > >> > >> In my opinion we should support recent kernels rather soon. > >> > >> So i wonder whether we have to keep v4l1 and buzz supported or whether > >> removing support therefore (what Nicola's patch does) is fine, too. > >> > >> Personally speaking i would vote for the second choice as we have > >> extremely > >> limited resources for maintenance. > >> However, if (and only if) this hardware should be still in use by > >> Cinelerra > >> users (please speak up if that's the case for you!) we should consider > >> adding an option to configure. > >> > >> Regardless wheter we want to make support optional or remove it > >> completely, > >> i suggest to release a new version of cinelerra (2.1.6?) supporting > >> linux > >> kernels >=2.6.39 as soon as possible. > >> > >> What is you opinion on that? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Simeon > >> > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) > >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >> > >> iEYEARECAAYFAk3f378ACgkQph/voQkhF7wY2QCfbmllYDUFhhQALALNdzJJT642 > >> 2YEAoMa4VCHslFLFwMqp7aN6/WeeoqqX > >> =4oJ+ > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Cinelerra mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cinelerra mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > >
