On 08/07/2013 at 10:00 AM, cinelerra-requ...@skolelinux.no wrote: > >Send Cinelerra mailing list submissions to > cinelerra@skolelinux.no > >On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 08:24 +0000, tryn...@hushmail.com wrote: ...[snip]... >> >> I really went to work on other issues in my life and can not >prompty come back to >> finish this topic. >> >> Pls. allow me more time to do so. Thank you. >> >> > >> >Today's Topics: >> > >> > 1. Re: Motion plugin does great work, but perspective >correction >> > is impossible (tryn...@hushmail.com) >> > ...[snip]... >> >Message: 1 >> >Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:55:45 +0000 >> >From: tryn...@hushmail.com >> >To: "cinelerra" <cinelerra@skolelinux.no> >> >Subject: Re: [CinCV] Motion plugin does great work, but >perspective >> > correction is impossible >> > >> > http://youtu.be/Pq_ZvyIkgEM >> > >> > Lectio 12, Cinerella Motion Stabilization (Krug za Trg) PART 2 >> > >> > >> >If that is not let though in full 1920x1080, then is there I >could >> >upload this for developers to make my case? >> > ...[snip]... > >I've just realised the same has been happening to me. >I've sent a number of patches over the past year or so, and I've >just >realised that they don't appear to have made it into the archives. > >I'll have to take a look back through the stuff I've sent to see >what >didn't make it. > >-- >Craig >
It hasn't been the mail-server, which works, with occasional delays, that has been keeping me from finishing the subject that I started (along with the inability to finish the work in progress itself), but unrelated (only related as much as they are also GNU as Cinelerra), problems with my SOHO network, still not completely solved. I would like to keep this topic in sight, though, and if anybody understood the issues, and looked through the parts that I presented, of which those that show exact lack of final developers' work I have tried to point out in the PART 2 video (the Youtube address above)... If anybody undestood the issue, then it can be clear both why I can not go on with either much of explanation (other pressing issues on me, and my not being a programmer), and also neither with the work itself. And neither with the work itself. Because those non-parallel, and still possible to recognize and to correct to smooth (user talking here) frames I am just not happy with. I know I could probably go and use some Windoze, or Windoze-originating program, or some mogul or big busines what not, and finish it there, but I like GNU free programs so much better then proprietory stuff which is not truly free even if you don't pay for it. OTOH, I would be able to understand just a little more about it, within my reach, probably from the imagemagick mailing list, but that list is not really working... Well, let me just hope for the Cinelerra to move on once I have more time to dedicate to this issue. I'm always glad to see patches coming in (as I saw on this mailing list) and work making Cinelerra better... I looked up, but don't really get what those patches are about, and if anyone knows that the git or cvs Cinelerra could maybe do the work that's missing in my videos, that I tried to demonstate, pls. let me know! Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia P.S. Pls. don't trust Youtube for the number of views! They often purpusefully, or just spitefully lie about it. Do they ever give URL of the visitors, say with, parts more specific that would reveal real users blanked? Ever? Pls. don't trust Youtube for the number of views! I've had some number of emails that I wouldn't have if people had not seen those videos, and I am pretty much censored having often been loud and very dissenting, so... _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra
