Just an fyi. Due to some architectural differences you can't really compare the CPU numbers between previous NPE's to the G2.
While the graph of CPU vs. pps goes up pretty closely inline with what a G1 will do the G2 will forward close to double the G1 in packets per second approaching the no drop rate (NDR) the G2 can handle. We (TAC) have had multiple cases lately where customers upgrade to a G2 and don't see their CPU drop considerably and they think the box isn't as good as we said it is. That isn't true because when you go back and evaluate the NDR's side by side the G2 is much faster. I was personally involved in those NDR test comparison between the G1 and G2 and know it's true. Rodney On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:40:19AM +0200, Brian Turnbow wrote: > I recently did an upgrade from npe-400 to G1 on a router with 1600pppoa users > that pumps 50Mbs(about 40% of that Voip traffic) > The 400 was running at 75% the G1 dropped it to 35% > I would expect the G2 to do even better. > > Brian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: mercoled? 18 aprile 2007 3.39 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2 > > That raises a good question...if an NPE-400 with 2000 PPPoA and 35 PPPoE > operates at 44% today, what would a G2 bring that down to? > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clayton Zekelman > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 7:08 PM > To: ; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2 > > > > I'm running one with Version 12.4(4)XD4. So far 15 weeks of uptime, no > issues with 924 L2TP, and 762 PPPoE sessions - 24% CPU Utilization. > > Come to think of it, I would have thought I'd be seeing a bit better > performance. > > > ----- Original Message --------------- > > Subject: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2 > From: " " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:27:02 -0400 > To: [email protected] > > >Does anyone have experience/feedback that they're willing to share on > >the moderately new G2 engine ? I suspect that software is more of a > >wild card than the hardware itself. Does anyone have an opinion on > >whether one is better off with 12.4.11T or 12.2SB ? > >_______________________________________________ > >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
