SIP card has more power to handle QoS, and some feature like VPLS may be limited from FlexWan module
Also, you may need to note that SIP card will required additional cost for SMARTNET maintenance. It requires card based SMARTNET license if I remember correctly, and FlexWAN does not. Overall, FlexWan is hardware compatible with Cisco 7200/7500 port adapters. It is low performance, and low density. OSM card pretty mich depreciated... SIP/SPA is high performance, high density, which is compatible with GSR/CRS series. Hyun Peter Basquiat wrote: > It's not really clear in which direction our QoS stuff will expand. At the > moment Iam thinking > on typically class-based wfq on core and edge. > > What are the differences regarding QoS on the WS-X6582-2PA compared to > SIP400/SPA? > > Other question: talking about features, what's with the WS-X67xx modules, > are there other/more > features available or do they have only more bandwidth? > > SIP400+SPA is much more expensive, without knowledge about the exact > advantages it's really > hard to judge. > > > >> Peter, >> >> Going for the SIP/SPA combination would allow you more features especially >> > with regards to QoS and VPN PE-CE support. > >> Can you expand a bit about what kind of core/access QoS you require? >> >> Arie >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
