-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think you have missed some important factors:
Do you need totally non-overbooked linecards? What are your QoS requirements, will LAN type QoS (small buffers and few queues) suffice for your needs, or do you need hierarchical shaping and deep buffers? Sincerely Peter Salanki CTO Bahnhof AB (AS8473) www.bahnhof.se Office: +46855577132 Cell: +46709174932 6 jun 2007 kl. 18.59 skrev Auquier Benoit: > Hi, > > I'm looking for info on what would be technically equivalent to one > redundant juniper m120 configuration in terms of cisco hardware. > Requirements are : > - redundant PSU > - redundant routing engine > - ability to take 4 full BGP views and about 25 peers > - 10 interfaces, gigabit ethernet type > - ability to scale to 10 GB ethernet in near future without too much > re-investment outside interface cards . > > Could somebody point me to the right range of models ? > > > thanks > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGZv9YiQKhdiFGiogRAiaqAKCkgvdVn53cD01paVqRJi25jh1AVACfVd3c nqGkGQSuaOny89zzrYUMJsE= =x4Xy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
