Hi,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:47:01PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I was mostly curious if someone had had issues with them, other than these
> documented limitations.
Some of the worst problems we experienced:
- switch suddenly stopping to switch any traffic, requiring a power cylce
(we had the device RMAed, but the second one did it as well). TAC never
found the reason.
- when you applied ACLs to the GE ports, and the ACL exceeded a certain
length and could not fit to the TCAM anymore, the switch *SILENTLY*
removes the ACL from the interface (it prints a warning to CONSOLE,
but not to vty, syslog, or anywhere else where you might actually
notice). TAC claimed "this cannot be changed".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
