At 05:23 AM 6/24/2007, Gert Doering wrote: >Hi, > >On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:47:01PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > > I was mostly curious if someone had had issues with them, other than these > > documented limitations. > >Some of the worst problems we experienced: > > - switch suddenly stopping to switch any traffic, requiring a power cylce > (we had the device RMAed, but the second one did it as well). TAC never > found the reason. > > - when you applied ACLs to the GE ports, and the ACL exceeded a certain > length and could not fit to the TCAM anymore, the switch *SILENTLY* > removes the ACL from the interface (it prints a warning to CONSOLE, > but not to vty, syslog, or anywhere else where you might actually > notice). TAC claimed "this cannot be changed". >
We've had that same problems as you in the past, it was a curious learning experience. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
