Does the next hop exist in the route table? If it doesn't, the packet will "fall through" and be routed according to the routing table.
What does "debug ip policy" say? --afsheenb omar parihuana wrote: > Hi List, > > I've configured an policy routing, however the packets don't match the > policy. I re-checked the configuration and all seems fine, I don't know why > that configuration don't work!!! (the packets traverse by default route and > not by Next-hop configured into route-map. > > I've paste my configuration: > > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0.73 > encapsulation dot1Q 73 > ip address 172.20.0.49 255.255.255.252 > no ip redirects > no ip proxy-arp > ip policy route-map NEXT-HOP > no cdp enable > arp timeout 300 > end > ! > > ! > route-map NEXT-HOP permit 10 > match ip address 160 > set interface Serial1/0:0 > set ip next-hop 172.16.1.134 > ! > > ! > access-list 160 permit ip 172.20.0.48 0.0.0.3 any > ! > > Thanks > > *The router is a Cisco 3640 with CEF Enabled that works like MPLS-PE router. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
