Agree with Alex, L3VPN can be suitable for certain types of customers who request L2 service, when you speak to them and work out what they "actually" need.
A subject of contention here can be if you propogate customer IP TTL into MPLS shim and hence allow your P routers to issue TTL exceed messages back to the C/CE routers , in such case, with cisco you can only disable this behaviour wholly at each PE and not selectively which has been one of my long standing rants. Dave. Alexander Koch wrote: > On Fri, 27 July 2007 11:28:56 -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote: >> Joe Maimon wrote: >> > Frame-Relay to Ethernet interworking is available in 12.411T IIRC. >> >> >> What about HDLC or PPP? This will not be a frame T1. > > What about any variant of a Layer3 IP VPN? > > -ako, > having been there himself > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
