Hi,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:00:50PM +1000, Gunjan GANDHI (BR/EPA) wrote:
> MED should not be used under this scenario as both the upstream routes
> are from different providers. Unless both providers have agreed upon a
> MED benchmark value, it is not wise to use MED for route selection. It
> is like comparing oranges with apples.
I strongly disagree here - this is purely a matter of local policy.
MED is a much better tool for careful traffic adjustment than local-pref.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
