On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Garry Glendown wrote: > I have just enabled a second E1 for a customer. No problem there as > such, just two point-to-point links with same weight routes pointing > towards both links, results in a pretty equal distribution of the > traffic flows on both links. Of course this also means a single flow > will only have a maximum of 2mbit of bandwidth available (which in this > case isn't really much of a problem - at least not yet). I could go > Multilink PPP, but as the lines are supposed to be redundant, I don't > want to risk the whole bundle being unusable if one of the links is dead ...
Multilink [is supposed to] gracefully handles member links coming and going. Your other option is cef per-packet, which is fine for most data, but potentially bad for VOIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
