Yep, all E1s going to/from same equipment (both 7200). I did, but it seems didn't make any better :(
:: a. rahman isnaini r. sutan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lincoln Dale (ltd)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "a. rahman isnaini r. sutan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:48 AM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] MLPPP maximum load > I'm running this MLPPP on 7200 NPE 400. > Much better bundling up to 8 T1s/E1s as the overhead not significantly > different againts le say bundling 2-3 E1s ? > Thanks this is fresh to me. > > Sometimes weird thing like packet loss happening. > Clearing ARP entries, shutting down the interface MLPPP or even serial > ports, and bring them back to up no more loss, even the traffic eventually > raises up and higher. are all the T1s/E1s going to/from the same place? do they all have similar link distance/latency characteristics? you may need to tune the mlppp fragment-delay... cheers, lincoln. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.17/951 - Release Date: 8/13/2007 10:15 AM _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
