Networkers <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:02 AM:
> On 8/27/07 1:33 AM, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Networkers <> wrote on Monday, August 27, 2007 2:02 AM: >> >>> OK I've been looking at this all day. I got it half working. >> >> your config looks "interesting", interface multilink shouldn't be >> used in your environment, this is not a leased-line. QoS, IP and NAT >> should be enabled on the virtual-template, which will take affect on >> the resulting virtual-access interface. > > Thanks Oliver, so without Multilink, how will two loadbalanced > interfaces share an IP address? Through the virtual-template. But I did overlook that you actually have two PPPoA links which you need to bundle together (I initially thought that you only used MLP to do LFI). In that case, http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft /122t/122t13/ftatmmlt.htm seems to apply, which involves a multilink interface, but I think it might also work without one, but then you need to configure the vtemplate as ip unnumbered. I'm not sure, and can't try this out. Sorry I missed this. >> What is your bandwidth on this link? LFI might not be required if the >> upstream speed is above ~600kbps.. > > These are dual 1.5 Meg lines. then you don't need LFI. oli _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
