I'll ask and see what I can find out for ya.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:42:47PM +0100, David Freedman wrote: > > It would be most useful to us in 7200 code right now... > (we are unlikely to trunk on 7600) > > Dave. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Dickinson > To: Rodney Dunn > Cc: David Freedman; '[email protected]' > Sent: 24/09/07 19:41 > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bug CSCeh27672 (EoMPLS MTU enhancements) > > Rodney Dunn wrote: > > It's not in any shipping code yet. > > > > I happened to check it today as I'm in a Carrier Ethernet Services > class. > > > > There is a request in to port the changes to SRA and SRB throttle. > > > > No clue yet where they will allow them to go yet. > > > > Rodney > > Thanks for this Rodney. > > Although I really want this as described, I want this backporting to > 12.2SB > (or 12.2SRC depending on what happens there) and 12.0S, to be able to > really > rely on it, ie 7200/7301/GSR as well as 7600. Any updates on target > releases > for this would be greatly appreciated. > > Ian > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 02:00:24AM +0100, David Freedman wrote: > > > >>Appears to now be "resolved", does anybody know what feature name this > >>became, or where I can find it? > >> > >>I'm looking at being able to modify VLAN based EoMPLS attachment > circuit > >>"perceived" MTU such to be able to fool an EoMPLS pseudowire into > being able > >>to come up (to pass RFC4447 MTU check) when trunk (main) interface is > of a > >>higher MTU on the local router than on the remote. > >> > >>Kind Regards, > >> > >>David Freedman > > -- > Ian Dickinson > Senior Network Development Engineer > Pipex Communications > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pipex.net > > This e-mail is subject to: http://www.pipex.net/disclaimer.html _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
