Correct. We have this hack^Wsetup in production for some time now. Route maps need to be on the receiving router, or they won't change next-hop.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Bering Sent: 19. október 2007 06:29 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] iBGP between PE and CE Hi, >The route-map didn't work. We've set the route-map: [snip] >But it doesn't seem to make any difference (and yes we reset >the session). >The IOS complained: >% Warning: Next hop address is our address Set it as in incoming route-map at the other end of the link instead. I did some tests on that and it appeared to work just fine. -- Regards Christian Bering IP engineer, nianet a/s Phone: (+45) 7020 8730 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
