Mohamed, As many have already said, you lose the ability to see some info from your peer. If you only have 1 upstream then it is worth the memory it takes. Removing will free up memory since that looks like where your concern lies. I would try to upgrade your memory if possible.
Aaron On Dec 18, 2007 9:43 AM, Paolo Lucente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mohamed, > > to add to what has already been said that if the BGP session with your > neighbor supports Route Refresh capability, you will still be able to > apply new policies softly - which helps overcoming the major drawback > of resetting the session thus impacting the live service. > > To check this out: "show ip bgp neighbor <IP address>" and then look > at the "Neighbor capabilities" section. > > Cheers, > Paolo > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:30:23PM -0000, Mohamed Ahmad wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I was wondering what was the effect of disabling "soft-reconfiguration > > inbound" on our neighbor statement with our provider (basically a live > > network). I was looking at the ram usage and it's been going up slowly. > We > > currently receive full table from our provider but filter to get only > > default (I know we can get them to just send a default but we might > remove > > filter in the future to get full routes on an upgraded router). Any ill > > effects of removing the "soft-reconfiguration inbound"? > > > > Many thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Registered Company No.: 4206916 > > VAT No.: GB 774 2593 02 > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
