-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Phil Bedard wrote: > That's really the "killer app" for this so to speak, is in a L2 metro > scenario where you can't propagate the customer link-state back to the > terminating L3 router. Even the lowest end Cisco router runs BGP > these days, so I've used that in the past with private ASs for > customers dual-homed, but that requires more configuration and > monitoring, etc. The other option is GRE tunnels but that isn't a > very good solution imho. BFD seems like a better option to me. It's > supported by Juniper, but Cisco seems to only have support in IOS XR. > > I guess a question to pose to Cisco is what takes more CPU, BFD or IP > SLA? If they are the same, IP SLA (reliable static routes) is > certainly an option. >
It's supported in more than XR: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/fs_bfd.html#wp1240666 In fact, echo mode is supported on some platforms as well now. - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHho8yE1XcgMgrtyYRAtWTAKDv6j5Ujq0DWF+HP20Ji3N1A31ZIwCg+Xwv Al+uHwDvDb+8Oxi5dF+Yrxk= =QYHd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
