Hi! When I add a static route for this prefix, then this happens: sh ip bgp x.x.x.x/19 BGP routing table entry for x.x.x.x/19, version 267365606 Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table, RIB-failure(17)) Flag: 0x820
sh ip bgp rib-failure Network Next Hop RIB-failure RIB-NH Matches x.x.x.x/19 1.1.1.1 Higher admin distance n/a The cpu load is now down. The bgp process doesn't consume too much cpu ressources. But this is only a short workaround. Any ideas why this happend ? In BGP I have two entries for that network x.x.x.x/15 and x.x.x.x/19 The entry for /15 makes no problem. Is this a misconfiguration of the other provider ? Regards, Ahmad -- Ahmad Cheikh-Moussa ISP-Technik NetUSE AG Dr.-Hell-Straße, 24107 Kiel, Germany Telefon: +49 431 2390 400 -- Telefax: +49 431 2390 499 Service: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://NetUSE.DE/ Vorstand: Andreas Seeger (Vorsitz), Dr. Roland Kaltefleiter, Dr. Joerg Posewang Aufsichtsrat: Detlev Huebner (Vorsitz) Sitz der AG: Kiel, HRB 5358 USt.ID: DE156073942 Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Das unbefugte Kopieren dieser E-Mail oder die unbefugte Weitergabe der enthaltenen Informationen ist nicht gestattet. The information contained in this message is confidential or protected by law. Any unauthorised copying of this message or unauthorised distribution of the information contained herein is prohibited. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/