Hi, On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:29:26PM +1030, Ben Steele wrote: > There is no doubt what-so-ever that netflow is far superior(and more > resource hungry) to ip accounting,
Actually netflow is much *less* resource-hungry than "ip accounting".
(Been there, measured it, result was impressive).
There even was a feature early in 12.0S to make "ip accounting" based
on netflow data (something like "service netflow feature-accelearation"
or so), because netflow is much better optimized in IOS and scales much
better, but that was discontinued due to general depreciation of
"ip accounting".
... but on a T1 link, neither should have measurable impact... :)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp1w6aANQB08.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
