Hi, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:36:40AM +0000, Howard Jones wrote: > We have an existing network of (mostly) 7206VXRs which I'd like to run > MPLS over if I can. Thing is, for historical reasons, there's isn't > really a core as such - each router is an edge to something. From my > reading, almost everything describes CE-PE-P routers, but are P actually > required? I can see that as it scales, it's the P that makes that work > better, but purely from the point of view of running some AToM tunnels > or L3VPNs over a mixed underlying network, they aren't necessary on day > 1 are they?
You don't need Ps :)
(I'm not exactly sure whether CE-PE-CE AToM is supported, but
CE-PE-PE-CE AToM etc. definitely works)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpJq6qqcxCDJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
