(Troy Beisigl question prompted me to ask mine about smaller MPLS) We have an existing network of (mostly) 7206VXRs which I'd like to run MPLS over if I can. Thing is, for historical reasons, there's isn't really a core as such - each router is an edge to something. From my reading, almost everything describes CE-PE-P routers, but are P actually required? I can see that as it scales, it's the P that makes that work better, but purely from the point of view of running some AToM tunnels or L3VPNs over a mixed underlying network, they aren't necessary on day 1 are they?
Or should I just forget about it? Thanks for any insight on this - everything I've read about MPLS seems to be aimed at Telcos looking to simplify their national network, not little guys looking at adding flexibility. Howie _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
