Hi, On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:35:47AM -0400, Mike Johnson wrote: > Is anyone doing layer 3 to the access layer? Problems? Cost? > > I know it would be cheaper to go layer 2 to the access but I am looking for > problems/issues tchnically that make it less attractive?
L3 is usually a LOT easier to troubleshoot ("where in the path is this
packet loss happening? can we please test *this* specific link for
bit errors?").
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpyuoqgc44Pf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
