On Mon, Mar 24, 2008, Mike Johnson wrote: > This thread has gone a little off course, I am really interested in L3 to > the access. > In addition, are there any reasons for not doing it or good reasons to do > it?
Probably because "edge" to us can mean lots of different things. > current Cisco and Juniper CAN designs to recommend L2 to the access. Dial is L3, DSL is L3 (sort of, sometimes!); hosting may be L2 but it may be private VLAN/subif type "L2" which is L3 + proxy ARP to "pretend" to be L2. More information, perhaps? Adrian _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
