Gary Wasn't this router Wednesday only a month or so worth of updates, if that?
If so, imagine 6 months worth! I guess we get to find out what it is really like at the end of September 2008. On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For example one of the vulnerabilities was a DLSw issue. If > > you're not running DLSw anywhere, then there's not much need > > to continue reading that bulletin. > > From Microsoft Tuesday experience, that is not an entirely > safe approach. You have to read far enough into the advisory > so that you are sure you are not running some combination > of features that end up enabling the vulnerability as a > side effect. While Cisco has fewer side effects than some > vendors, sometimes a default is not what one would expect, > and just reading the title is not adequate (oh, you mean > I get proxy-arp by default?) > > Carefully reading a handful of emails every six months > (and others as necessary for active exploits) does not > feel like a large burden to me. But I may be unique. > > Gary > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
