Ian MacKinnon wrote: > Pete Templin wrote: >> Think of this at a higher level: you "have" to patch, so now you get to >> plan your maintenance windows. > > not getting at you here Pete, but why do you "have" to patch? > Cisco release software all the time that fixes bugs (and introduces new > features), should you always be on the latest release everywhere?
I meant to carry another thought into that last email, but your reply worked as an even better introduction: Think of this at a higher level: Cisco has now announced its patching strategy. If this doesn't fit your way of business, choose a vendor that does fit, or speak up to Cisco. pt _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
